Probability and decision

Philosophy of Science 33 (3):250-261 (1966)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One hears increasingly from philosophers that statistical inference is a technical study that is well in control by statisticians and should be left to them; and one hears, increasingly, from mathematical statisticians that all this talk about interpretations of probability is so much philosophical frosting that is utterly irrelevant to the serious business of producing mathematical statistics. "The more interpretations of probability there are, the wider the scope of applications of our purely mathematical theories." The point of this paper is to present, in detail, a situation in which an individual with given degrees of belief, given evidence, and given values, will have three different and contrary courses of action recommended to him, each according to one of the three most popular interpretations of probability

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
29 (#567,300)

6 months
15 (#185,076)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Two autonomous axiom systems for the calculus of probabilities.Karl R. Popper - 1955 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 6 (21):51-57.
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science | Vol 73, No 3.Karl R. Popper - 1955 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 6 (24):351-351.
Probability and randomness.Henry E. Kyburg - 1963 - Theoria 29 (1):27-55.
``Probability and Randomness".Henry E. Kyburg - 1963 - Theoria 29 (1):27--55.

Add more references