Who Do Men Say That I Am? [Book Review]

Review of Metaphysics 19 (1):153-153 (1965)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book is a sort of junior search for the historical Jesus. The authoress throws in a dash of dialectic by interlarding the cursory text with questions for the reader. The presentation of complex exegetical and theological problems is so oversimplified that this book should prove equally embarrassing for both the liberals and the orthodox.—D. J. B.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Who Do Men Say That I Am? [REVIEW]J. B. D. - 1965 - Review of Metaphysics 19 (1):153-153.
The Nature of Fiction.Gregory Currie - 1990 - Cambridge University Press.
Dictionary of Orthodox Theology. [REVIEW]A. R. E. - 1965 - Review of Metaphysics 18 (3):584-584.
Reading the Bible Theologically.Darren Sarisky - 2019 - Cambridge University Press.
Christ the Center. [REVIEW]G. K. R. - 1969 - Review of Metaphysics 23 (2):342-342.
The historical Jesus and the search for God.Stephen J. Patterson - 1998 - HTS Theological Studies 54 (3/4).
The idol and distance: five studies.Jean-Luc Marion - 2001 - New York: Fordham University Press.
Philosophical Argument and Wicked Problems. [REVIEW]Stephen Turner - 2018 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 48 (1):71-79.
Calvin and Hobbes, or Hobbes as an orthodox Christian.Edwin Curley - 1996 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (2):257-271.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-10

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references