Environmental Ethics 1 (4):321-327 (1979)
AbstractThe destructive tension between human needs and environmental conservation arises from flaws in our political and economic structures. Oppression of people and devastation of nature go hand in hand, and the root of both these evils is the denial of otherness. The ecology movement is basically a movement of liberation, and is in league, de jure and de facto, with other liberation movements, since it seeks to promote the rights ofthe nonhuman world. In this context, subjugation of the Other is immoral in all forms and ultimately suicidal. Recognition of the value of nonhuman nature doesn’t preclude a rational use of it, but requires something analogous to the primitive custom of apologizing to the spirits of prey, i.e., a mixture of religious respect and common sense. Awareness of the beauty and power of nature, like awareness ofthe injured rights of our fellow humans, creates a revolutionary moral imperative to change the life of our society
Similar books and articles
The Liberation of Life: From the Cell to the Community.Charles Birch - 1981 - Cambridge University Press.
Eco-Socialism: From Deep Ecology to Social Justice.David Pepper - 1993 - Routledge.
Making Political Ecology.Roderick P. Neumann - 2005 - Distributed in the United States of America by Oxford University Press.
To speak of trees: Social constructivism, environmental values, and the future of deep ecology.Mick Smith - 1999 - Environmental Ethics 21 (4):359-376.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads