Carnap and de finetti on bets and the probability of singular events: The dutch book argument reconsidered

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (4):325-346 (1978)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hidden Assumptions in the Dutch Book Argument.C. Waidacher - 1997 - Theory and Decision 43 (3):293-312.
On Generalizing Kolmogorov.Richard Dietz - 2010 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (3):323-335.
Countable additivity and subjective probability.Jon Williamson - 1999 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (3):401-416.
De Finetti was Right: Probability Does Not Exist.Robert F. Nau - 2001 - Theory and Decision 51 (2/4):89-124.
De finetti, countable additivity, consistency and coherence.Colin Howson - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (1):1-23.
Is there a dutch book argument for probability kinematics?Brad Armendt - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (4):583-588.
Countable additivity and the de finetti lottery.Paul Bartha - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (2):301-321.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
74 (#219,135)

6 months
22 (#119,049)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Hidden Assumptions in the Dutch Book Argument.C. Waidacher - 1997 - Theory and Decision 43 (3):293-312.
The Role of 'Dutch Books' and of 'Proper Scoring Rules'.Bruno De Finetti - 1981 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 32 (1):55 - 56.

Add more citations