An Apology for Philosophical Transgressions

European Journal of Japanese Philosophy 2:43-67 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The essay that follows is, in substance, a lecture delivered in Brussels on 7 December 2016 to the 2nd International Conference of the European Network of Japanese Philosophy. In it I argue that the strategy of qualifying nothingness as an “absolute,” which was adopted by Kyoto School thinkers as a way to come to grips with fundamental problems of Western philosophy, is inherently ambiguous and ultimately weakens the notion of nothingness itself. In its place, a proposal is made to define nothingness in terms of “connectedness.” The discussion is bound on both ends by an apology for transgressing established academic boundaries. On one end, I open with a brief digression on a common ground for philosophies East and West as a mestizaje to which no tradition can claim dominance. On the other, I close with an appeal for restoring respect for the role of mythical narration as a way to bridge the connection between theory and practice without having to revert to moral absolutes, particularly as it relates to safeguarding this fragile planet of ours from the ongoing sepsis of economic “progress.”

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Religion and Nothingness.Keiji Nishitani - 1982 - University of California Press.
Religion and Nothingness.David Edward Shaner - 1987 - Philosophy East and West 37 (4):458-462.
Translation of Tosaka Jun's "The Philosophy of the Kyoto School".Kenn Nakata Steffensen - 2016 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 8 (1):53-71.
God and nothingness.Robert E. Carter - 2009 - Philosophy East and West 59 (1):pp. 1-21.
Nishida Kitaro.Yamamoto Seisaku & James W. Heisig (eds.) - 1991 - University of California Press.
The Concept of “Person” in Keiji Nishitani and Max Scheler.Philip Blosser - 2016 - International Philosophical Quarterly 56 (3):359-370.
The Kyoto School's Takeover of Hegel: Nishida, Nishitani, and Tanabe Remake the Philosophy of Spirit.Peter Suares (ed.) - 2010 - Lexington Books, a Division of Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-08

Downloads
167 (#106,983)

6 months
78 (#49,055)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James W. Heisig
Nanzan University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references