Husserl Studies 33 (3):229-257 (2017)

George Heffernan
Merrimack College
In The Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, Husserl argues that the only way to respond to the scientific Krisis of which he speaks is with phenomenological reflections on the history, method, and task of philosophy. On the assumption that an accurate diagnosis of a malady is a necessary condition for an effective remedy, this paper aims to formulate a precise concept of the Krisis of the European sciences with which Husserl operates in this work. Thus it seeks an answer to the question: What exactly, according to Husserl, is “the ‘crisis’ [Krisis] of the European sciences”? There are two different tendencies in the literature on this question. According to the traditional interpretation, the Krisis of the European sciences lies not in the inadequacy of their scientificity but in the loss of their meaningfulness for life. According to an innovative suggestion, the Krisis lies not in the loss of their meaningfulness for life but in the inadequacy of their scientificity. These readings are mutually exclusive because each claims that the other misidentifies the Krisis as something that it is not. The argument of this paper, however, is that, given the many different senses of Krisis in The Crisis, an adequate understanding of the Krisis that Husserl identifies requires not a disjunctive but an inclusive approach. Therefore the paper proposes that Husserl’s Krisis of the European sciences is both a crisis of their scientificity and a crisis of their meaningfulness for life. The relevance of this result to Husserl’s philosophical and historical sense-investigations in The Crisis—as well as to the present critical situation of philosophy—is self-evident.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10743-017-9209-0
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,163
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Sein Und Zeit.Martin Heidegger (ed.) - 1927 - M. Niemeyer.
Sein und Zeit.Martin Heidegger - 1928 - Annalen der Philosophie Und Philosophischen Kritik 7:161-161.
Sein Und Zeit.Martin Heidegger - 1929 - Mind 38 (151):355-370.

View all 39 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Trust and Betrayal From a Husserlian Standpoint.Sean Petranovich - 2018 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 26 (2):251-274.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What is the Crisis of Western Sciences?Emiliano Trizio - 2016 - Husserl Studies 32 (3):191-211.
Husserl e le scienze.Joao I. Piedade - 2003 - Gregorianum 84 (3):673-695.
Husserl’s Crisis as a Crisis of Psychology.Uljana Feest - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (2):493-503.


Added to PP index

Total views
43 ( #263,328 of 2,507,021 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,155 of 2,507,021 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes