Man and World 22 (2):185-213 (1989)

Authors
George Heffernan
Merrimack College
Abstract
According to the leading commentators and the author himself, Edmund Husserl's Formal and transcendental Logic is the most important work on phenomenological logic ever written. Nonetheless, it has, in general, gained far less attention than theLogical Investigations and the Ideas on a Pure Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy. In particular, the argument of § 1 of the Logic, namely, that it is fruitful to start with the meanings of the expression “logos” in order to develop a genuinely transcendental logic, has received virtually no consideration. This paper takes a step towards filling this empty space by analyzing and criticizing the argument of § 1 as a problem to which (a) solution(s) must be found: First, it offers an introduction to the problem per se, which is one of the relationship between speech and reason; second, it tries to bring the given senses of “logos” to a higher grade of conceptual clarity and distinctness than that in the text; third, it attempts to decide whether and how far these senses of the word can be documented according to principles of Classical philology; fourth, it endeavors to determine exactly the relationship between the meanings of “logos” in § 1 and the senses of “logic” in §§ 1–107; finally, it strives to show that, with respect to the account of the relationship between speech and reason provided by Husserl in the Logic, there is, at best, a conflict and, at worst, a contradiction between the strategy outlined in § 1 and the tactics adopted in § 2ff. Throughout, the paper reads Husserl's “descriptions” as ‘arguments’ for his positions, thereby avoiding any of the obscurity sometimes infecting work in “Continental philosophy”.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF01256645
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,337
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Conclusion.[author unknown] - 1926 - Archives de Philosophie 4 (3):112.
The Linguistic Turn.[author unknown] - 1968 - Philosophical Books 9 (1):32-32.
Einleitung.[author unknown] - 1991 - Die Philosophin 2 (3):5-6.
Einleitung.[author unknown] - 1996 - Die Philosophin 7 (14):5-8.
Einleitung.[author unknown] - 1990 - Die Philosophin 1 (2):5-6.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Edmund Husserl on the Applicability of Formal Geometry.René Jagnow - 2006 - In Emily Carson & Renate Huber (eds.), Intuition and the Axiomatic Method. Springer. pp. 67-85.
Transcendental Logic Redefined.Manuel Bremer - 2008 - Review of Contemporary Philosophy 7.
Husserl’s Phenomenology.Dan Zahavi - 2002 - Stanford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-01-25

Total views
23 ( #493,065 of 2,507,897 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,715 of 2,507,897 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes