Scientific Objectivity and Framework Transpositions

Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 19:55-70 (1970)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The classical notion of scientific objectivity is a property of propositional truth. It is the property of being open to testing and inspection, in principle, by all men, although in practice perhaps, the testing of a scientific claim is restricted to the members of a community of professional experts. It is, moreover, the property of being stable in time, true eternally as it were; for objective truth is thought to express what is so independently of human interests, initiatives, bias, social circumstances and historical environment. Often there is the added connotation that what is so is pictured not in its relationship to man, but absolutely, as it were, in itself, or in its relations to the rest of nature, where nature is taken to have an essence independently of the meaning conferred on nature by Dasein. All this is expressed as truth-invariance relative to synchronous communities of knowers whether sympatric or allopatric : truth-invariance relative to allochronous communities of knowers, and truth-invariance relative to the physical transformations and substitutions which define the objective content of a scientific law or theory.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Logic of Framework Transpositions.Patrick A. Heelan - 1971 - International Philosophical Quarterly 11 (3):314-334.
The scope and limits of scientific objectivity.Joseph F. Hanna - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (3):339-361.
Scientific objectivity and the logics of science.H. E. Longino - 1983 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (1):85 – 106.
Objectivity.Lorraine Daston - 2007 - Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press. Edited by Peter Galison.
IV. Longino and heidegger on objectivity.Philip Lewin - 1984 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 27 (1-4):145-148.
Concept Formation and Scientific Objectivity: Weyl’s Turn against Husserl.Iulian D. Toader - 2013 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 3 (2):281-305.
Observation And Objectivity.Harold I. Brown - 1987 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Marx and the Objectivity of Science.Peter Railton - 1984 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:813 - 826.
Objectivity, relativism, and truth.Richard Rorty - 1991 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Requirements for An Adequate Aesthetics of Nature.Allen Carlson - 2007 - Environmental Philosophy 4 (1-2):1-13.
Can scientists be objective?Malcolm Williams - 2006 - Social Epistemology 20 (2):163 – 180.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
50 (#298,123)

6 months
3 (#760,965)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Recollections on Founding the International Journal of Philosophical Studies(IJPS).Dermot Moran - forthcoming - International Journal of Philosophical Studies:1-13.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
Testability and meaning.Rudolf Carnap - 1936 - Philosophy of Science 3 (4):419-471.
Problems of empiricism.Paul Feyerabend - 1965 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Nature of the Physical World.A. Eddington - 1928 - Humana Mente 4 (14):252-255.

View all 22 references / Add more references