Measurement invariance, selection invariance, and fair selection revisited

Psychological Methods 28 (3):687-690 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This note contains a corrective and a generalization of results by Borsboom et al. (2008), based on Heesen and Romeijn (2019). It highlights the relevance of insights from psychometrics beyond the context of psychological testing.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-26

Downloads
377 (#70,938)

6 months
136 (#33,816)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Jan-Willem Romeijn
University of Groningen
Remco Heesen
London School of Economics

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Identity and the Limits of Fair Assessment.Rush T. Stewart - 2022 - Journal of Theoretical Politics 34 (3):415-442.
On the Possibility of Testimonial Justice.Rush T. Stewart & Michael Nielsen - 2020 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 98 (4):732-746.

Add more references