Expediting the Flow of Knowledge Versus Rushing into Print

PhilSci Archive (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recent empirical work has shown that many scientific results may not be reproducible. By itself, this does not entail that there is a problem. However, I argue that there is a problem: the reward structure of science incentivizes scientists to focus on speed and impact at the expense of the reproducibility of their work. I illustrate this using a well-known failure of reproducibility: Fleischmann and Pons' work on cold fusion. I then use a rational choice model to identify a set of sufficient conditions for this problem to arise, and I argue that these conditions plausibly apply to a wide range of research situations. In the conclusion I consider possible solutions and implications for how Fleischmann and Pons' work should be evaluated.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 107,599

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The problem of rational theory-choice.Howard Sankey - 1995 - Epistemologia 18 (2):299-312.
Dynamic Pluralism: A Pluralist Framework for Science.Juan Ferret - 2003 - Dissertation, University of Oregon
Rebuttal to Douglas and Elliott.Robert Hudson - 2022 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 53 (2):211-216.
Wright on the McKinsey Problem.Anthony Brueckner - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (2):385-391.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-20

Downloads
55 (#459,334)

6 months
2 (#1,486,714)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Remco Heesen
London School of Economics

Citations of this work

Add more citations