Beloften en teleurstellingen van artificiële intelligentie voor wetenschappelijke ontdekkingen

Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 113 (1):55-80 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Promises and disappointments of artificial intelligence for scientific discovery Recent successes within Artificial Intelligence with deep learning techniques in board games gave rise to the ambition to apply these learning methods to scientific discovery. This model for discovering new scientific laws is based on data-driven generalization in large databases with observational data using neural networks. In this study we want to review and critical assess an earlier research programme by the name of BACON. Though BACON was based on different AI technology, we can learn from its limitations and thus adjust our expectations. The BACON program had two ambitions, one descriptive and one normative. On the one hand, it wanted to provide an explanation how philosophers of nature in history arrived at general laws from observational data and on the other hand it also aimed to reconstruct historical discoveries and realize new ones. We will assess the claims of the BACON program by means of two historical cases studies: the discovery of the sine law of refraction in optics and the discovery of Kepler’s third law of planetary motion. I will demonstrate that, despite the formulated claims, BACON did not use the same historical data available to its discoverers and, more importantly, that the model of inductive generalization of observational data does not correspond with the historical methods. Finally I will question the value of data-driven induction for scientific discovery in general.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,953

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Computational Scientific Discovery.D. Sozou Peter, C. Lane Peter, Addis Mark & Gobet Fernand - 2017 - In Magnani Lorenzo & Bertolotti Tommaso Wayne (eds.), Springer Handbook of Model-Based Science. Springer. pp. 719-734.
Artificiële intelligentie en normatieve ethiek.Lode Lauwaert - 2019 - Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte 111 (4):585-603.
Francis Bacon and the Laws of Ramus.Peter R. Anstey - 2015 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 5 (1):1-23.
The prospects for machine discovery in linguistics.Vladimir Pericliev - 1999 - Foundations of Science 4 (4):463-482.
The Cambridge companion to Bacon.Markku Peltonen & Peltonen Markku (eds.) - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Afterword: data, knowledge, and e-discovery. [REVIEW]David D. Lewis - 2010 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 18 (4):481-486.
Abduction and Hypothesis Withdrawal in Science.Lorenzo Magnani - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 37:180-187.
A.I., Scientific discovery and realism.Mario Alai - 2004 - Minds and Machines 14 (1):21-42.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-05-17

Downloads
12 (#1,113,154)

6 months
2 (#1,258,417)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Albrecht Heeffer
Ghent University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references