Studies in Philosophy and Education 36 (2):183-195 (2017)

Authors
Mary Healy
University of Roehampton
Abstract
An important theme in the philosophy of education community in recent years has been the way in which philosophy can be brought to illuminate and evaluate research findings from the landscape of policy and practice. Undoubtedly, some of these practices can be based on spurious evidence, yet have mostly been left unchallenged in both philosophical and educational circles. One of the newer practices creeping into schools is that of ‘No best friend’ policies. In some schools, this is interpreted as suggesting that children should not have just one best friend but a group of good friends. In others, it is interpreted as suggesting that children should forgo having best friends altogether and be friends with everyone. What is common to both is that friendship is seen as somehow ‘dangerous’. This article offers a preliminary examination of what has been referred to as this ‘dark side’ of friendship. Whilst philosophers such as Patricia White have previously alluded to its existence, there has been little philosophical scrutiny in any broad terms elsewhere. I examine three common arguments commonly used to justify ‘No best friends’ practices: that children can be friends with everyone; that young children are developmentally incapable of ‘real’ friendship hence best friendship should be avoided until later age; that only good people can be good friends. I indicate why this unreflective adoption of practices matters so much and why we should be prepared to challenge these cases. I identify practices that we have good evidence to support as making a positive difference in this area.
Keywords ‘No best friends’  Friendship and morality  Rejection and ostracism  Pupil well-being  Policy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11217-016-9512-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,979
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Moral Judgement of the Child.Jean Piaget - 1933 - Philosophy 8 (31):373-374.
The Moral Judgment of the Child.Jean Piaget - 1934 - Mind 43 (169):85-99.
Friendship and the Self.Dean Cocking & Jeanette Kennett - 1998 - Ethics 108 (3):502-527.

View all 16 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Notion of Character Friendship and the Cultivation of Virtue.Diana Hoyos-Valdés - 2018 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 48 (1):66-82.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Should We Take the Friendships of Children Seriously?Mary Healy - 2011 - Journal of Moral Education 40 (4):441-456.
Friendship.Bennett W. Helm - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Moral Issues in Friendship.Ellen L. Fox - 1991 - Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Friendship and Epistemic Norms.Jason Kawall - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (2):349-370.
Animals as Friends.Cynthia Townley - 2010 - Between the Species 13 (10):3.
Just Friends, Friends and Lovers, Or…?Caroline J. Simon - 1993 - Philosophy and Theology 8 (2):113-128.
Aristotle on Self-Knowledge and Friendship.Zena Hitz - 2011 - Philosophers' Imprint 11:1-28.
Could an Egoist Be a Friend?Joe Mintoff - 2006 - American Philosophical Quarterly 43 (2):101 - 118.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-02-10

Total views
37 ( #306,801 of 2,505,146 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,142 of 2,505,146 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes