On What Will Be: Reply to Westphal

Erkenntnis 67 (1):137-142 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Jonathan Westphal's recent paper attempts to reconcile the view that propositions about the future can be true or false now with the idea that the future cannot now be real. I attempt to show that Westphal's proposal is either unoriginal or unsatisfying. It is unoriginal if it is just the well-known eternalist solution. It is unsatisfying if it is instead making use of a peculiar, tensed truthmaking principle.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
93 (#180,813)

6 months
10 (#251,846)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Chris Heathwood
University of Colorado, Boulder

Citations of this work

Presentism and Truthmaking.Ben Caplan & David Sanson - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (3):196-208.
Tensed Truthmaker Theory.Sam Baron - 2015 - Erkenntnis 80 (5):923-944.
Much ado about aboutness.Sam Baron, Reginald Mary Chua, Kristie Miller & James Norton - 2019 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy (3).
Ostrich presentism.Giuliano Torrengo - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 170 (2):255-276.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Four Dimensionalism: An Ontology of Persistence and Time.Theodore Sider - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (3):642-647.
Truth and the Past.Michael Dummett - 2003 - Columbia University Press.
Truth and the Past.Michael Dummett - 2003 - Cambridge University Press.
On presentism and triviality.Thomas M. Crisp - 2004 - Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 1:15-20.

View all 8 references / Add more references