The epistemic opacity of autonomous systems and the ethical consequences

AI and Society 38 (5):1819-1827 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper takes stock of all the various factors that cause the design-time opacity of autonomous systems behaviour. The factors include embodiment effects, design-time knowledge gap, human factors, emergent behaviour and tacit knowledge. This situation is contrasted with the usual representation of moral dilemmas that assume perfect information. Since perfect information is not achievable, the traditional moral dilemma representations are not valid and the whole problem of ethical autonomous systems design proves to be way more empirical than previously understood.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Trust and resilient autonomous driving systems.Adam Henschke - 2020 - Ethics and Information Technology 22 (1):81-92.
Trustworthiness of autonomous systems.S. Kate Devitt - 2018 - In Hussein A. Abbass, Jason Scholz & Darryn Reid (eds.), Foundations of Trusted Autonomous Systems. Springer. pp. 161-184.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-07-31

Downloads
34 (#445,975)

6 months
14 (#154,299)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mihály Héder
Technical University of Budapest

References found in this work

Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Willard V. O. Quine - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (1):20–43.
Personal knowledge.Michael Polanyi - 1958 - Chicago,: University of Chicago Press.
Personal Knowledge.Michael Polanyi - 1958 - Chicago,: Routledge.
Two Dogmas of Empiricism.W. V. Quine - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (1):20-43.

View all 10 references / Add more references