Gross Violations

In Victor Kumar & Nina Strohminger (eds.), The Moral Psychology of Disgust. London, UK: pp. 141-150 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When should we listen to our guts and when should we ignore them? What makes disgust and other related emotions morally relevant in some situations but not others? In this paper, I argue that emotions are morally relevant only when they are backed up by reasons and arguments.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,346

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Morally Relevant Features.Bernard Gert - 1999 - Metaphilosophy 30 (1&2):13-24.
The response model of moral disgust.Alexandra Plakias - 2018 - Synthese 195 (12):5453-5472.
What in the World Is Moral Disgust?Alberto Giubilini - 2016 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94 (2):227-242.
Punitive emotions and Norm violations.Benoît Dubreuil - 2010 - Philosophical Explorations 13 (1):35 – 50.
Farewell to tachyons?L. Basano - 1980 - Foundations of Physics 10 (11-12):937-948.
Fortunes-of-Others Emotions and Justice.Kristján Kristjánsson - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Research 28:105-128.
Foul Behavior.Victor Kumar - 2017 - Philosophers' Imprint 17.
Animal emotions.Beth Dixon - 2001 - Ethics and the Environment 6 (2):22-30.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-05-17

Downloads
27 (#433,607)

6 months
3 (#226,063)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Carol Hay
University of Massachusetts, Lowell

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references