Destructibility of the tree property at ${\aleph _{\omega + 1}}$

&
Journal of Symbolic Logic 84 (2):621-631 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/jsl.2019.4

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Destructibility of the tree property at אω+1.Yair Hayut & Menachem Magidor - forthcoming - Journal of Symbolic Logic:1-10.
The Consistency Strength of Successive Cardinals with the Tree Property.Matthew Foreman, Menachem Magidor & Ralf-Dieter Schindler - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (4):1837-1847.
Aronszajn and Kurepa trees.James Cummings - 2018 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 57 (1-2):83-90.
Weak partition properties on trees.Michael Hrušák, Petr Simon & Ondřej Zindulka - 2013 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 52 (5-6):543-567.
The consistency strength of choiceless failures of SCH.Arthur W. Apter & Peter Koepke - 2010 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 75 (3):1066-1080.
AD[syntactic turnstile] the [aleph]"n" are Jonsson cardinals and [aleph] omega is a Rowbottom cardinal.E. M. Kleinberg - 1977 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 12 (3):229.
Possible values for 2 (aleph n) and 2 (aleph omega).Moti Gitik & Carmi Merimovich - 1997 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 90 (1-3):193-241.
The consistency strength of successive cardinals with the tree property.Matthew Foreman, Menachem Magidor & Ralf-Dieter Schindler - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (4):1837-1847.
Models with the ω-property.Roman Kossak - 1989 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (1):177-189.
Fragility and indestructibility of the tree property.Spencer Unger - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (5-6):635-645.
Review: Uri Abraham, Aronszajn Trees on $mathscr{N}2$ and $mathscr{N}3$; James Cummings, Matthew Foreman, The Tree Property; Menachem Magidor, Saharon Shelah, The Tree Property at Successors of Singular Cardinals. [REVIEW]Arthur W. Apter - 2001 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 7 (2):283-285.
A remark on the tree property in a choiceless context.Arthur W. Apter - 2011 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 50 (5-6):585-590.
The differences between Kurepa trees and Jech-Kunen trees.Renling Jin - 1993 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 32 (5):369-379.
The tree property at successors of singular cardinals.Menachem Magidor & Saharon Shelah - 1996 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 35 (5-6):385-404.
The strong tree property and weak square.Yair Hayut & Spencer Unger - 2017 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 63 (1-2):150-154.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-11

Downloads
15 (#849,371)

6 months
2 (#889,309)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

On the ideal J[κ].Assaf Rinot - 2022 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 173 (2):103055.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Squares, scales and stationary reflection.James Cummings, Matthew Foreman & Menachem Magidor - 2001 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 1 (01):35-98.
The tree property at successors of singular cardinals.Menachem Magidor & Saharon Shelah - 1996 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 35 (5-6):385-404.
Souslin trees and successors of singular cardinals.Shai Ben-David & Saharon Shelah - 1986 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 30 (3):207-217.

Add more references