Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 46 (6):656-683 (2021)

Authors
Abstract
Medical ethics would be better if people were taught to think more clearly about well-being or the concept of what is good for a person. Yet for a variety of reasons, bioethicists have generally paid little attention to this concept. Here, I argue, first, that focusing on general theories of welfare is not useful for practical medical ethics. I argue, second, for what I call the “theory-without-theories approach” to welfare in practical contexts. The first element of this approach is a focus on examining important and relatively uncontroversial constituents of welfare as opposed to general theories. The second key element is a framework for thinking about choice in relation to welfare, a framework I refer to as “the mild objectivity framework.” I conclude with illustrations of the way in which the “theory without theories approach” can improve thinking in medicine.
Keywords well-being, welfare, best interests, quality of life, decision-making, bioethics, medical ethics, teaching bioethics, teaching medical ethics, relation of theory to practice  well-being  welfare  best interests  quality of life  medical decision-making  bioethics  medical ethics  teaching bioethics  teaching medical ethics  relation of theory to practice
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/jmp/jhab028
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Thinking, Fast and Slow.Daniel Kahneman - 2011 - New York: New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford University Press.
Welfare, Happiness, and Ethics.L. W. Sumner - 1996 - Oxford University Press.
A Philosophy for the Science of Well-Being.Anna Alexandrova - 2017 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 51 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Well-Being and Health.Richard Kim & Daniel M. Haybron - 2021 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 46 (6):645-655.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Making Sense of Medical Ethics: A Hands-on Guide.Alan G. Johnson - 2006 - Distributed in the U.S.A. By Oxford University Press.
Avoiding Evasion: Medical Ethics Education and Emotion Theory.C. Leget - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (5):490-493.
Medical Ethics: Who Decides What?M. Kottow - 1983 - Journal of Medical Ethics 9 (2):105-108.
In Defence of Medical Ethics.M. H. Kottow - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (4):340-343.
Review Essay: The Nature of Medicine and the Teaching of Medical Ethics.[author unknown] - 1990 - Bioethics 4 (1):66-77.
Medical Ethics: A Case Based Approach.R. Ashcroft - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (7):e10-e10.
Global Bioethics as Modern Medical Ethics.Svitlana Pustovit & Liudmyla Paliei - 2012 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 2 (3-4):166-171.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-12-10

Total views
179 ( #64,529 of 2,498,784 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
80 ( #9,414 of 2,498,784 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes