Res Publica 13 (1):77-100 (2007)

Philosophers have tended to dismiss John Stuart Mill’s claim that ‘all silencing of discussion is an assumption of infallibility’. I argue that Mill’s ‘infallibility claim’ is indeed open to many objections, but that, contrary to the consensus, those objections fail to defeat the anti-authoritarian thesis which lies at its core. I then argue that Mill’s consequentialist case for the liberty of thought and discussion is likewise capable of withstanding some familiar objections. My purpose is to suggest that Mill’s anti-authoritarianism and his faith in thought and discussion, when taken seriously, supply the basis for a ‘public interest’ account of ‘freedom of expression as the liberty of thought and discussion’ which is faithful to Mill in spirit, if not to the precise letter. I outline such an account, which – as I say in conclusion – can serve as a valuable safeguard against ad hoc, reactive legislation, and the demands of a spurious communitarianism.
Keywords free speech  freedom of expression  thought and discussion  J. S. Mill: On Liberty
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11158-006-9016-5
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,192
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On Liberty.John Stuart Mill - 1859 - Broadview Press.
A Theory of Freedom of Expression.Thomas Scanlon - 1972 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (2):204-226.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006: A Millian Response.Alexander Brown - 2008 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (1):1-24.
On Behalf of J. S. Mill's 'Assumption of Infallibility' Argument.Alexander Brown - 2010 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (5):857-873.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Autonomy, Slavery, and Mill's Critique of Paternalism.Alan E. Fuchs - 2001 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (3):231-251.
Was Mill a Liberal?Chin-Liew Ten - 2002 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1 (3):355-370.
Leibniz's Mill Arguments Against Materialism.Stewart Duncan - 2012 - Philosophical Quarterly 62 (247):250-72.
Feyerabend, Mill, and Pluralism.Elisabeth A. Lloyd - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):407.
Rational Freedom in John Stuart Mill's Feminism.Maria Morales - 2007 - In Nadia Urbinati & Alex Zakaras (eds.), J.S. Mill's Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment. Cambridge University Press.
Liberty of Expression its Grounds and Limits (I).H. J. McCloskey - 1970 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 13 (1-4):219 – 237.
Mill on Liberty.Ted Honderich - 1967 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):292 – 297.
Getting Mill Right.Deni Elliott - 2007 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 22 (2-3):100 – 112.
Liberty of Expression its Grounds and Limits (II).D. H. Monro - 1970 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 13 (1-4):238 – 253.


Added to PP index

Total views
178 ( #65,952 of 2,507,405 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #102,846 of 2,507,405 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes