- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Review of Azuelos-Atias (2007): A Pragmatic Analysis of Legal Proofs of Criminal Intent [Book Review]
Pragmatics and Cognition 16 (1):203-213 (2008)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
S. Azuelos-Atias, A Pragmatic Analysis of Legal Proofs of Criminal Intent [REVIEW].Bernard S. Jackson - 2009 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 22 (3):365-372.
The rationality of legal argumentation.Sol Azuelos Atias - 2009 - Pragmatics and Cognition 17 (2):383-401.
Identifying the meanings hidden in legal texts: The three conditions of relevance theory and their sufficiency.Sol Azuelos-Atias - 2016 - Semiotica 2016 (209):99-123.
A Pragma-Dialectical Approach of the Analysis and Evaluation of Pragmatic Argumentation in a Legal Context.Eveline T. Feteris - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (3):349-367.
Manipulation by deliberate failure of communication.Sol Azuelos-Atias - 2015 - Pragmatics and Society 6 (4):502-516.
Harm and culpability.A. P. Simester & A. T. H. Smith (eds.) - 1996 - New York: Oxford University Press.
On the Incoherence of Legal Language to the General Public.Sol Azuelos-Atias - 2011 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 24 (1):41-59.
Unlocking Morality from Criminal Law.Thom Brooks - 2017 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 14 (3):339-352.
The Limits of Criminal Law: A Comparative Analysis of Approaches to Legal Theorizing by Carl Constantin Lauterwein: Ashgate, Surrey, 2010, 162 pp, £60.00. Hardback ISBN 978-0-7546-7946-2. [REVIEW]Arlie Loughnan - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (3):687-691.
Semantically cued contextual implicatures in legal texts.Sol Azuelos-Atias - 2010 - Journal of Pragmatics 42 (3):728-743.
[Book review] justification defenses and just convictions. [REVIEW]Robert F. Schopp - 1999 - Criminal Justice Ethics 18 (1):41-51.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-18
Downloads
33 (#473,861)
6 months
6 (#512,819)
2014-01-18
Downloads
33 (#473,861)
6 months
6 (#512,819)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
What is reasoning? What is an argument?Douglas N. Walton - 1990 - Journal of Philosophy 87 (8):399-419.
On Translation.Paul Ricoeur & John Sallis - 2002 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (2):197-199.
Certainty, reasonableness and argumentation in law.Stefano Bertea - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (4):465-478.
Dire et ne pas dire, Principes de sémantique linguistique.O. Ducrot - 1974 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 164 (3):339-340.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-pp8v9 uwo