Why they shared: recovering early arguments for sharing social scientific data

Science in Context 33 (2):101-119 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ArgumentMost social scientists today think of data sharing as an ethical imperative essential to making social science more transparent, verifiable, and replicable. But what moved the architects of some of the U.S.’s first university-based social scientific research institutions, the University of Michigan’s Institute for Social Research, and its spin-off, the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, to share their data? Relying primarily on archived records, unpublished personal papers, and oral histories, I show that Angus Campbell, Warren Miller, Philip Converse, and others understood sharing data not as an ethical imperative intrinsic to social science but as a useful means to the diverse ends of financial stability, scholarly and institutional autonomy, and epistemological reproduction. I conclude that data sharing must be evaluated not only on the basis of the scientific ideals its supporters affirm, but also on the professional objectives it serves.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Openness in the social sciences: Sharing data.Joan E. Sieber - 1991 - Ethics and Behavior 1 (2):69 – 86.
Challenges of web-based personal genomic data sharing.Pascal Borry & Mahsa Shabani - 2015 - Life Sciences, Society and Policy 11 (1):1-13.
What Should Be the Data Sharing Policy of Cognitive Science?Mark A. Pitt & Yun Tang - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (1):214-221.
Data Sharing and Dual-Use Issues.Louise Bezuidenhout - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):83-92.
Data Sharing in the Context of Health-Related Citizen Science.Mary A. Majumder & Amy L. McGuire - 2020 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 48 (S1):167-177.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-16

Downloads
7 (#1,201,127)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Book Review. [REVIEW]Emily Hauptmann - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 94 (C):206-207.

Add more citations