What new axioms could not be

Dialectica 56 (2):109–124 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper exposes the philosophical and mathematical flaws in an attempt to settle the continuum problem by a new class of axioms based on probabilistic reasoning. I also examine the larger proposal behind this approach, namely the introduction of new primitive notions that would supersede the set theoretic foundation of mathematics

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Measurement without archimedean axioms.Louis Narens - 1974 - Philosophy of Science 41 (4):374-393.
First-order topological axioms.R. D. Kopperman - 1981 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 46 (3):475-489.
Routes to triviality.Susan Rogerson & Greg Restall - 2004 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (4):421-436.
On extremal axioms.Rudolf Carnap, Friedrich Bachmann & H. G. Bohnert - 1981 - History and Philosophy of Logic 2 (1-2):67-85.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
88 (#186,187)

6 months
7 (#339,156)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Theory and Evidence.Clark N. Glymour - 1980 - Princeton University Press.
Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science.Hermann Weyl - 1949 - Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Edited by Olaf Helmer-Hirschberg & Frank Wilczek.
Constructivism in mathematics: an introduction.A. S. Troelstra - 1988 - New York, N.Y.: Sole distributors for the U.S.A. and Canada, Elsevier Science Pub. Co.. Edited by D. van Dalen.
What is Cantor's Continuum Problem?Kurt Gödel - 1947 - The American Mathematical Monthly 54 (9):515--525.
The Higher Infinite.Akihiro Kanamori - 2000 - Studia Logica 65 (3):443-446.

View all 27 references / Add more references