Neuroethics 14 (2):303-314 (2021)

Matthew Haug
College of William and Mary
This paper draws on work in the sciences of the mind to cast doubt on some assumptions that have often been made in the study of self-control. Contra a long, Aristotelian tradition, recent evidence suggests that highly self-controlled individuals do not have a trait very similar to continence: they experience relatively few desires that conflict with their evaluative judgments and are not especially good at directly and effortfully inhibiting such desires. Similarly, several recent studies have failed to support the view that self-control capacities are constituted, at least in part, by excellent inhibitory executive function ability. I propose an alternative “indirect harmony” hypothesis about trait self-control. According to this hypothesis, if there is a character trait of being highly self-controlled, it consists in motivational harmony within the mind that is brought about through the effective use of indirect resistance strategies that prevent occurrent motivational conflict from emerging in the first place. If this hypothesis is correct, high trait self-control in actual humans does not fit neatly into the traditional categories of either continence or temperance. I conclude by drawing out several implications this hypothesis has for future research on trait self-control and its relation to executive functions.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s12152-021-09457-9
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,599
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Intelligent Virtue.Julia Annas - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
精神状态的性质.Hilary Putnam - 1967 - In W. H. Capitan & D. D. Merrill (eds.), 艺术、思想和宗教. Pittsburgh University Press. pp. 1--223.
Picoeconomics.George Ainslie - 1992 - Behavior and Philosophy 20:89-94.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Executive Functions in Synesthesia.Romke Rouw, Joram van Driel, Koen Knip & K. Ridderinkhof - 2013 - Consciousness and Cognition 22 (1):184-202.
Executive Functions Are Cognitive Gadgets.Senne Braem & Bernhard Hommel - 2019 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 42.
Event Coding, Executive Control, and Task-Switching.Nachshon Meiran - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):893-894.
Cognitive Control: Componential or Emergent?Richard P. Cooper - 2010 - Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (4):598-613.
The Role of Executive Control in Tool Use.Gijsbert Stoet & Lawrence H. Snyder - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (4):240-241.
14. Real Traits, Real Functions?Colin Allen - 2002 - In Andre Ariew, Robert Cummins & Mark Perlman (eds.), Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology. Oxford University Press. pp. 373.


Added to PP index

Total views
11 ( #835,745 of 2,462,217 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #178,845 of 2,462,217 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes