Making sense of what we are: A mythological approach to human nature

Philosophy 84 (1):95-109 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The question what makes us human is often treated as a question of fact. However, the term 'human' is not primarily used to refer to a particular kind of entity, but as a 'nomen dignitatis' -- a dignity-conferring name. It implies a particular moral status. That is what spawns endless debates about such issues as when human life begins and ends and whether human-animal chimeras are "partly human". Definitions of the human are inevitably "persuasive". They tell us about what is important and how we should live our lives as humans, and thus help us to make sense of what we are

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
98 (#170,891)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Hauskeller
University of Liverpool

Citations of this work

My brain, my mind, and I: Some philosophical assumptions of mind-uploading.Michael Hauskeller - 2012 - International Journal of Machine Consciousness 4 (01):187-200.
Pro-Enhancement Essentialism.Michael Hauskeller - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2 (2):45-47.

Add more citations

References found in this work

An Essay Concerning Human Understanding.John Locke - 1979 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 169 (2):221-222.
Human nature and the limits of science.John Dupré - 2001 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Crossing species boundaries.Jason Scott Robert & Françoise Baylis - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (3):1 – 13.
Vaulting Ambition.Philip Kitcher - 1988 - Noûs 22 (3):479-482.
Persuasive definitions.Charles Leslie Stevenson - 1938 - Mind 47 (187):331-350.

Add more references