Transl of Immanuel Kant: Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science

In Henry Allison & Peter Heath (eds.), Immanuel Kant: Theoretical Philosophy after 1781. Cambridge University Press. pp. 29-169, 465-484 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This edition of the Prolegomena presents Kant's thought clearly by paying careful attention to his original language. An extensive translator's introduction considers the origin and purpose of the Prolegomena, examines Kant's use of the analytic method, compares the structure of the Prolegomena to that of the Critique of Pure Reason, examines Kant's relation to Hume as expressed in this work, briefly surveys the work's reception, and offers a note on texts and translation. Detailed scholarly notes accompany the translation itself.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Prolegomena to any future metaphysics that will be able to present itself as a science: with two early reviews of the Critique of pure reason.Immanuel Kant - 2004 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Günter Zöller & Peter G. Lucas.
Science and the Synthetic Method of the Critique of Pure Reason.Melissa McBay Merritt - 2006 - Review of Metaphysics 59 (3):517-539.
Immanuel Kant's Prolegomena to any future metaphysics: in focus.Beryl Logan (ed.) - 1996 - New York: Routledge.
Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics: With Two Early Reviews of the Critique of Pure Reason.Immanuel Kant - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Günter Zöller & Peter G. Lucas.
Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics: With Two Early Reviews of the Critique of Pure Reason.Günter Zöller (ed.) - 2004 - New York: Oxford University Press UK.
Pure Reason’s Enlightenment: Transcendental Reflection in Kant’s first Critique.Karin de Boer - 2010 - Kant Yearbook 2 (1):53-74.
The Metaphysics of Kantian Epistemology.Avery Goldman - 2002 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:239-252.
Modality and Metaphysics in Kant.Toni Kannisto - 2013 - In Stefano Bacin, Alfredo Ferrarin, Claudio La Rocca & Margit Ruffing (eds.), Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht. Akten des XI. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Boston: de Gruyter. pp. 633-646.
The Sources of a Priori Knowledge: A Commentary on Kant's Notions of Sensibility, Understanding, and Reason.James Roland Carter - 1980 - Dissertation, The Ohio State University
Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics That Will Be Able to Present Itself as a Science: With Selections From the Critique of Pure Reason.Immanuel Kant - 1997 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Gary C. Hatfield & Immanuel Kant.
A Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: Transcendental Aesthetic and Analytic.Karl Aschenbrenner - 1983 - Upa.
Kant's transcendental imagination.Gary Banham - 2005 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science: With Selections from the Critique of Pure Reason by Immanuel Kant; Gary Hatfield. [REVIEW]Patricia Kitcher - 1998 - Isis 89:547-548.
Bausteine zur Entstehungsgeschichte der Kritik der reinen Vernunft Kants.Giovanni B. Sala - 1987 - Kant Studien 78 (1-4):153-169.
Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science, with Kant's Letter to Marcus Herz, February 27, 1772 the Paul Carus Translation.Immanuel Kant & James W. Ellington - 2001

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-12-17

Downloads
59 (#265,945)

6 months
14 (#170,850)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gary Hatfield
University of Pennsylvania

Citations of this work

Scepticism and the Development of the Transcendental Dialectic.Brian A. Chance - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (2):311-331.
Kant on analogy.John J. Callanan - 2008 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (4):747 – 772.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references