First Philosophy and Natural Philosophy in Descartes

In A. J. Holland (ed.), Philosophy, Its History and Historiography. Reidel. pp. 149-164 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Descartes was both metaphysician and natural philosopher. He used his metaphysics to ground portions of his physics. However, as should be a commonplace but is not, he did not think he could spin all of his physics out of his metaphysics a priori, and in fact he both emphasized the need for appeals to experience in his methodological remarks on philosophizing about nature and constantly appealed to experience in describing his own philosophy of nature. During the 1630s, he offered empirical support for the basic principles of his natural philosophy, while also promising to provide a metaphysical justification. He offered the metaphysical justification in the Meditations and Principles. and claimed absolute certainty for it. At the same time, he recognized that the particular postulated mechanisms of his natural philosophy did not reach that standard of certainty. These mechanisms were supported by empirical testing or confirming of causes through observed effects

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Descartes' Philosophy of Nature.Abubaker Ibrahim Tallue - 1984 - Dissertation, Tulane University
Science, Certainty, and Descartes.Gary Hatfield - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:249 - 262.
Metaphysics and Natural Philosophy in Descartes and Newton.Andrew Janiak - 2013 - Foundations of Science 18 (3):403-417.
The Senses and the Fleshless Eye: The Meditations as Cognitive Exercises.Gary Hatfield - 1986 - In Amelie Rorty (ed.), Essays on Descartes' Meditations. University of California Press. pp. 45–76.
The "Superior Penetration" of Neo-European Philosophy.V. V. Vasil'ev - 1998 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 37 (2):45-65.
The Relevance of Descartes's Philosophy for Modern Philosophy of Science.Gerd Buchdahl - 1963 - British Journal for the History of Science 1 (3):227-249.
Descartes.Tom Sorell - 1987 - New York ;: Oxford University Press.
Scepticism and science in Descartes.José Luis Bermúdez - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (4):743-772.
Descartes: a very short introduction.Tom Sorell - 1987 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-10-12

Downloads
538 (#32,470)

6 months
76 (#56,750)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gary Hatfield
University of Pennsylvania

Citations of this work

The cognitive faculties.Gary Hatfield - 1998 - In Daniel Garber & Michael Ayers (eds.), The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 953–1002.
Animals.Gary Hatfield - 2008 - In Janet Broughton & John Carriero (eds.), Companion to Descartes. Blackwell. pp. 404–425.
Descartes' physiology and its relation to his psychology.Gary Hatfield - 1992 - In John Cottingham (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Descartes. Cambridge University Press. pp. 335--370.
Reason, Nature, and God in Descartes.Gary Hatfield - 1993 - In Stephen Voss (ed.), Essays on the Philosophy and Science of Rene Descartes. Oxford University Press. pp. 259–287.
Was Spinoza a Naturalist?Alexander Douglas - 2014 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 96 (1):77-99.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations