Can Social Trinitarianism Be Monotheist?

Faith and Philosophy 30 (4):439-443 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dale Tuggy has criticized my proposal for the doctrine of the Trinity, claiming that social trinitarianism cannot be monotheistic. I present a counter-argument, and consider the ways in which Tuggy might respond to it.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Deception and the Trinity: A Rejoinder to Tuggy.William Hasker - 2011 - Religious Studies 47 (1):117 - 120.
Divine deception and monotheism: a reply to Hasker.Dale Tuggy - 2011 - Religious Studies 47 (1):109-115.
Hasker's Quests for a Viable Social Theory.Dale Tuggy - 2013 - Faith and Philosophy 30 (2):171-187.
The unfinished business of trinitarian theorizing.Dale Tuggy - 2003 - Religious Studies 39 (2):165-183.
Objections to Social Trinitarianism.William Hasker - 2010 - Religious Studies 46 (4):421 - 439.
Constitution Trinitarianism.Dale Tuggy - 2013 - Philosophy and Theology 25 (1):129-162.
Trinity.Dale Tuggy - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Two Trinities: Reply to Hasker.Brian Leftow - 2010 - Religious Studies 46 (4):441 - 447.
No Title available: Book reviews. [REVIEW]Dale Tuggy - 2009 - Religious Studies 45 (2):232-237.
Two trinities: Reply to Hasker: Brian Leftow.Brian Leftow - 2010 - Religious Studies 46 (4):441-447.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-15

Downloads
52 (#293,581)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William Hasker
Huntington University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Anti social trinitarianism.Brian Leftow - 1999 - In Trinity, The. Oxford University Press. pp. 203-249.

Add more references