Authors |
|
Abstract |
The framing question of Mills' important and thought-provoking paper is whether there is reason for political progressives and radicals to employ the notion of a social contract for either descriptive or normative purposes. In contrast to the common response that the social contract is a piece of "bourgeois mystification" he argues instead that a reformulated conception of the contract, one which he calls the.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Social Contracts and Corporations: A Reply to Hodapp. [REVIEW]Thomas Donaldson - 1990 - Journal of Business Ethics 9 (2):133 - 137.
Race and the Limits of Liberalism.Kevin M. Graham - 2002 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (2):219-239.
Comment on Munoz-Dardé's'liberty's Chains'.Niko Kolodny - 2009 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 83 (1):197-212.
Renegotiating the Social Contract: Hobbes to Rawls.Deborah A. Kissinger - 2003 - Dissertation, University of Hawai'i
Charles W. Mills, The Racial Contract:The Racial Contract.Thomas McCarthy - 1999 - Ethics 109 (2):451-454.
Strategic Ignorance.Alison Bailey - 2007 - In Shannon Sullivan & Nancy Tuana (eds.), Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance. State Univ of New York Pr. pp. 77--94.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
203 ( #56,144 of 2,499,697 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #44,535 of 2,499,697 )
2009-01-28
Total views
203 ( #56,144 of 2,499,697 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #44,535 of 2,499,697 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads