Corporations and Voting

Business Ethics Journal Review 6 (7):36-40 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In his thoughtful Commentary on my article, “Should Corporations Have the Right to Vote? A Paradox in the Theory of Corporate Moral Agency,” Kenneth Silver incorrectly asserts that I endorse Robert Dahl’s Principle of Affected Interests and social contract theory. To the extent that Silver’s criticism of my argument is based on the claim that I appeal to either theory as the ground for my claim that corporate moral agency entails a corporate right to vote, it is misguided. I rely only on the Rawlsian equal participation principle that invests those subject to the law with the right to vote. To the extent Silver’s criticism is directed to that assertion, it is on point.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,252

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Do I Think Corporations Should Be Able to Vote Now?Kenneth Silver - 2018 - Business Ethics Journal Review 6 (4):18-23.
Can a Corporation be Worthy of Moral Consideration?Kenneth Silver - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 159 (1):253-265.
Voting (Insincerely) in Corporate Law.Zohar Goshen - 2001 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 2 (2).
Voting Procedures.Michael Dummett - 1984 - Oxford University Press UK.
Is compulsory voting justified?Annabelle Lever - 2009 - Public Reason 1 (1):57-74.
Reflections on Averintsev’s Method.Olga Sedakova - 2005 - Studies in East European Thought 58 (2):73 - 84.


Added to PP

16 (#866,857)

6 months
3 (#961,598)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations