Can a Latin Trinity Be Social? A Response to Scott M. Williams

Faith and Philosophy 35 (3):356-366 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Scott Williams’s Latin Social model of the Trinity holds that the trinitarian persons have between them a single set of divine mental powers and a single set of divine mental acts. He claims, nevertheless, that on his view the persons are able to use indexical pronouns such as “I.” This claim is examined and is found to be mistaken.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Indexicals and the Trinity: Two Non-Social Models.Scott M. Williams - 2013 - Journal of Analytic Theology 1:74-94.
Time Travel and the Trinity.Brian Leftow - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (3):313-324.
The Trinity and Extended Simples.Martin Pickup - 2016 - Faith and Philosophy 33 (4):414-440.
Trinity Monotheism.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 2003 - Philosophia Christi 5 (2):375 - 403.
A Leftovian Trinity?William Hasker - 2009 - Faith and Philosophy 26 (2):154-166.
On Hasker on Leftow on Hasker on Leftow.Brian Leftow - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (3):334-339.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-27

Downloads
47 (#330,788)

6 months
7 (#411,886)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William Hasker
Huntington University

Citations of this work

Trinity.Dale Tuggy - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Philosophy and Christian theology.Michael Murray - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Material Constitution and the Trinity.Jeffrey E. Brower & Michael C. Rea - 2005 - Faith and Philosophy 22 (1):57-76.
Anti social trinitarianism.Brian Leftow - 1999 - In Trinity, The. Oxford University Press. pp. 203-249.

Add more references