Journal of Medical Ethics 49 (1):45–48 (2022)
AbstractIt is common to think of medical and ethical modes of thought as different in kind. In such terms, some clinical situations are made more complicated by an additional ethical component. Against this picture, we propose that medical and ethical modes of thought are not different in kind, but merely different aspects of what it means to be human. We further propose that clinicians are uniquely positioned to synthesise these two aspects without prior knowledge of philosophical ethics.
Similar books and articles
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Investigative Ordinary Language Philosophy.Doug Hardman & Phil Hutchinson - 2022 - Philosophical Investigations 45 (4):453-470.
Where the ethical action also is: a response to Hardman and Hutchinson.Nathan Emmerich - forthcoming - Journal of Medical Ethics.
Bioethics to the rescue! A response to Emmerich.Douglas Hardman & Phil Hutchinson - forthcoming - Journal of Medical Ethics.
References found in this work
The importance of values in evidence-based medicine.Michael P. Kelly, Iona Heath, Jeremy Howick & Trisha Greenhalgh - 2015 - BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):69.
Good and not so good medical ethics.Rosamond Rhodes - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (1):71-74.
What is it to do good medical ethics? A kaleidoscope of views.Raanan Gillon & Roger Higgs - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (1):1-4.
Defining `disease'--classification must be distinguished from evaluation.P. D. Toon - 1981 - Journal of Medical Ethics 7 (4):197-201.