Why Tolerate Conscientious Objections in Medicine

HEC Forum 33 (3):175-188 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Most arguments about conscientious objections in medicine fail to capture the full scope and complexity of the concept before drawing conclusions about their permissibility in practice. Arguments favoring and disfavoring the accommodation of conscientious objections in practice tend to focus too narrowly on prima facie morally contentious treatments and religious claims of conscience, while further failing to address the possibility of moral perspectives changing over time. In this paper, I argue that standard reasons against permitting conscientious objections in practice—that their permission may result in harm to patients, the idea that medical providers willingly enter into the medical field, and that conscientious objections stand contrary to medical professionalism—do not apply in all cases and that the medical field and health systems in which many physicians now practice should continue to tolerate conscientious objections in practice.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Market View on conscientious objection: overvalued.Robert F. Card - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (3):168-172.
Reply to Five Critics of Why Tolerate Religion?Brian Leiter - 2016 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (3):547-558.
The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine.Nir Ben-Moshe - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (6):404-410.
The virtues of evidence.Erica Zarkovich & R. E. G. Upshur - 2002 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 23 (4-5):403-412.
Religious Conscientious Exemptions.Yossi Nehushtan - 2011 - Law and Philosophy 30 (2):143-166.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-08-14

Downloads
18 (#711,533)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?