Water Management: Sacrificing Normative Practice Subverting the Traditions of Water Apportionment—‘Whose Justice? Which Rationality?’

Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (5):1241-1269 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since current water governance patterns mandate cooperation and partnership within and between the actors in the hydrosystems, supplementary models are necessary to distinguish the roles and the rules of indoor actions which is why we extend a theory in the frameworks of philosophy of technology. This analysis is empirically grounded on the problematic hydrosystems of a river in central Iran, Zayandehrud. Following a modernist-holistic-based analysis, it illustrates how values in the water apportionment mechanisms are being reshaped. The article by using the theory of normative practice has scrutinised the tasks and the rules of the old and new water-management systems, Mirab. Subsequently according to such philosophical theory, it has argued that the conflicts over the cases are due to interference of structural and directional norms within them

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Iran's water crisis: Cultural, political, and ethical dimensions. [REVIEW]Richard C. Foltz - 2002 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15 (4):357-380.
Is there a Puzzle about Water?Hagit Benbaji - 2007 - Philosophical Papers 36 (2):207-218.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-10-10

Downloads
39 (#397,578)

6 months
5 (#652,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?