Whitehead and Schools X, Y, and Z

In Nicholas Gaskill & Adam Nocek (eds.), The Lure of Whitehead. Univ. of Minnesota Press. pp. 231-248 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Graham Harman’s “Whitehead and Schools X, Y, and Z,” distinguishes among three schools of contemporary philosophy according to their respective positions on process, becoming, and relations: the schools of Whitehead and Latour, of Deleuze, Bergson, Simondon, and other philosophers of becoming, and of object-oriented philosophy. One of the goals of the essay is to challenge those who would too quickly align Whitehead with Deleuze.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Education and Human Diversity: The Ethics of Separate Schooling Revisited.Kevin Williams - 1998 - British Journal of Educational Studies 46 (1):26 - 39.
On the Construction of Whitehead's Metaphysical Language.Frank M. Doan - 1960 - Review of Metaphysics 13 (4):605 - 622.
The intelligibility of Whitehead's philosophy.A. H. Johnson - 1943 - Philosophy of Science 10 (1):47-55.
FREEDOM IN WHITEHEAD'S PHILOSOPHY: A Response to Edward Pols.John B. Cobb - 1970 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 7 (4):409-413.
Ten schools of the Vedānta.Roma Chaudhuri - 1973 - Calcutta: Rabindra Bharati University.
A Brief History of the Genesis of the New Schools' Inspection System.Gerran Thomas - 1998 - British Journal of Educational Studies 46 (4):415 - 427.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-09-17

Downloads
61 (#259,066)

6 months
11 (#225,837)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Graham Harman
American University in Cairo

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references