Value judgments in a COVID-19 vaccination model: A case study in the need for public involvement in health-oriented modelling

Social Science and Medicine 114323 (286) (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Scientific modelling is a value-laden process: the decisions involved can seldom be made using ‘scientific’ criteria alone, but rather draw on social and ethical values. In this paper, we draw on a body of philosophical literature to analyze a COVID-19 vaccination model, presenting a case study of social and ethical value judgments in health-oriented modelling. This case study urges us to make value judgments in health-oriented models explicit and interpretable by non-experts and to invite public involvement in making them.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Can One Both Contribute to and Benefit from Herd Immunity?Lucie White - 2021 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 14 (2).
Vaccination Policies.Marcel Verweij - 2013 - In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell.
Good reasons to vaccinate: mandatory or payment for risk?Julian Savulescu - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (2):78-85.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-10-11

Downloads
41 (#377,987)

6 months
12 (#203,353)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Symons
University of Kansas

Citations of this work

A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: Idealisations and the aims of polygenic scores.Davide Serpico - 2023 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 102 (C):72-83.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references