Journal of Economic Methodology 18 (4):409-426 (2011)

Hutchison's 1938 essay has been variously interpreted as introducing positivism, ultra-empiricism and Popperian falsificationism to economics. Yet his apparent inconsistency in maintaining all of these positions seems to have gone unnoticed in the literature. Previously I have criticized attempts to characterize Hutchison as a positivist or ultra-empiricist. In this article I argue that Klappholz and Agassi failed to support their claim that Hutchison introduced Popper's criterion to economics. That is, this paper deals with this specific question, rather than the wider one of whether or not Hutchison introduced Popperian falsificationism to economics. Yet the two issues are closely connected and so the latter question is briefly discussed. To the extent that the paper succeeds, it may help to resolve the inconsistency problem. For now it is possible that Hutchison in 1938 developed his own original and consistent position. The task of substantiating such a view by providing a positive account of his methodology is one for the future.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/1350178X.2011.628043
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,177
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Logic of Scientific Discovery.Karl Raimund Popper - 1934 - London, England: Routledge.
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge University Press.
From a Logical Point of View.W. V. O. Quine - 1953 - Harvard University Press.
A Treatise on Probability.John Maynard Keynes - 1921 - London, England: Dover Publications.

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Terence Hutchison's 1938 Essay: Towards a Reappraisal.John Hart - 2003 - Journal of Economic Methodology 10 (3):353-373.
Machlup's Misrepresentation of Hutchison's Methodology.John Hart - 2009 - Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (3):325-340.
A Conversation with Terence Hutchison.John Hart - 2002 - Journal of Economic Methodology 9 (3):359-377.
An Unfinished Manuscript by Terence Hutchison.Roger E. Backhouse - 2009 - Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (3):293-296.
A Formative Decade: Methodological Controversy in the 1930s.T. W. Hutchison - 2009 - Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (3):297-314.
John A. Hutchison, 1912-2000.Julia K. Hutchison - 2000 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 74 (2):111 - 112.
Situational Analysis Beyond Neoclassical Economists.Lawrence A. Boland - 1998 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (4):515-521.
Did Milton Friedman's Methodology License the Formalist Revolution?D. Wade Hands - 2003 - Journal of Economic Methodology 10 (4):507-520.


Added to PP index

Total views
39 ( #289,083 of 2,499,668 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #278,274 of 2,499,668 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes