The formal validity and real significance of the ontological argument

Philosophical Review 53 (3):225-245 (1944)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2182097

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The ontological argument.Graham Oppy - 2007 - In Paul Copan & Chad V. Meister (eds.), Philosophy of Religion: Classic and Contemporary Issues. Oxford UK: Blackwell.
The relevance of Kant's objection to Anselm's ontological argument.Chris Heathwood - 2011 - Religious Studies 47 (3):345-357.
Gigerenzer’s ‘external validity argument’ against the heuristics and biases program: an assessment.Andrea Polonioli - 2012 - Mind and Society 11 (2):133-148.
Stoic Syllogistic.Susanne Bobzien - 1996 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 14:133-92.
The ontological argument from Descartes to Hegel.Kevin J. Harrelson - 2009 - Amherst, N.Y.: Humanity Books.
God, guilt, and logic: The psychological basis of the ontological argument.Lewis S. Feuer - 1968 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 11 (1-4):257 – 281.
Reading Anselm's Proslogion: The History of Anselm's Argument and its Significance Today.Ian Logan - 2008 - Ashgate. Edited by Anselm.
The Ontological Meta-Argument.Elijah Millgram - 2004 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 4 (3):331-334.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
51 (#297,770)

6 months
10 (#213,340)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Modal Ontological Arguments.Gregory R. P. Stacey - 2023 - Philosophy Compass 18 (8):e12938.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references