Studying judgement: General issues

Thinking and Reasoning 7 (1):103 – 118 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The previous papers raise a number of issues. How should we develop task typologies both to separate judgement from related cognitive tasks and to classify tasks within the judgement domain? Are there grounds for selecting between models of judgement when empirical tests fail to do so? What techniques can be used to find out more about the cognitive processes underlying judgement behaviour? I discuss these issues and give a brief assessment of the current state of play in this rapidly changing area.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Frege's theory of Judgement.David Bell - 1979 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Kant: The audacity of judgement.Rocque Reynolds - 1999 - Res Publica 5 (1):67-82.
Studying judgement: Models and methods.Nigel Harvey - 2001 - Thinking and Reasoning 7 (1):1 – 3.
On aesthetic judgement and our relation to nature: Kant's concept of purposiveness.Fiona Hughes - 2006 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 49 (6):547-572.
Grain and content.Stephen Neale - 1998 - Philosophical Issues 9:353-358.
Principle-Based Moral Judgement.Maike Albertzart - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (2):339-354.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
39 (#356,630)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations