Bradford (2007)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
In _Reliable Reasoning_, Gilbert Harman and Sanjeev Kulkarni -- a philosopher and an engineer -- argue that philosophy and cognitive science can benefit from statistical learning theory, the theory that lies behind recent advances in machine learning. The philosophical problem of induction, for example, is in part about the reliability of inductive reasoning, where the reliability of a method is measured by its statistically expected percentage of errors -- a central topic in SLT. After discussing philosophical attempts to evade the problem of induction, Harman and Kulkarni provide an admirably clear account of the basic framework of SLT and its implications for inductive reasoning. They explain the Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension of a set of hypotheses and distinguish two kinds of inductive reasoning. The authors discuss various topics in machine learning, including nearest-neighbor methods, neural networks, and support vector machines. Finally, they describe transductive reasoning and suggest possible new models of human reasoning suggested by developments in SLT
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 2007, 2012 |
Buy this book | $21.98 used $29.98 new Amazon page |
ISBN(s) | 9780262083607 9780262517348 0262517345 0262083604 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The Myth of Language Universals: Language Diversity and its Importance for Cognitive Science.Nicholas Evans & Stephen C. Levinson - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (5):429-448.
The Explanation Game: A Formal Framework for Interpretable Machine Learning.David S. Watson & Luciano Floridi - 2020 - Synthese 198 (10):1–32.
Judging Machines: Philosophical Aspects of Deep Learning.Arno Schubbach - forthcoming - Synthese 198 (2):1807-1827.
Why Simpler Computer Simulation Models Can Be Epistemically Better for Informing Decisions.Casey Helgeson, Vivek Srikrishnan, Klaus Keller & Nancy Tuana - 2021 - Philosophy of Science 88 (2):213-233.
Common Sense as Evidence: Against Revisionary Ontology and Skepticism.Thomas Kelly - 2008 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 32 (1):53-78.
View all 33 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Précis of Reliable Reasoning: Induction and Statistical Learning Theory.Gilbert Harman & Sanjeev Kulkarni - 2009 - Abstracta 5 (S3):5-9.
Statistical Learning Theory as a Framework for the Philosophy of Induction.Gilbert Harman & Sanjeev Kulkarni - manuscript
Remarks on Harman and Kulkarni's "Reliable Reasoning".Michael Strevens - 2009 - Abstracta 5 (S3):27-41.
Review of Gilbert Harman, Sanjeev Kulkarni, Reliable Reasoning: Induction and Statistical Learning Theory. [REVIEW]Kevin Kelly - 2008 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (3).
Mind Changes and Testability: How Formal and Statistical Learning Theory Converge in the New Riddle of Induction.Daniel Steel - manuscript
Machine Learning and the Foundations of Inductive Inference.Francesco Bergadano - 1993 - Minds and Machines 3 (1):31-51.
What If the Principle of Induction Is Normative? Formal Learning Theory and Hume’s Problem.Daniel Steel & S. Kedzie Hall - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):171-185.
Testability and Ockham’s Razor: How Formal and Statistical Learning Theory Converge in the New Riddle of Induction. [REVIEW]Daniel Steel - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (5):471 - 489.
Reliable Reasoning, by Gilbert Harman and Sanjeev Kulkarni.J. Williamson - 2012 - Mind 121 (484):1073-1076.
Statistical Learning Theory: A Tutorial.Sanjeev R. Kulkarni & Gilbert Harman - 2011 - Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics 3 (6):543-556.
The Problem of Induction.Gilbert Harman & Sanjeev R. Kulkarni - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (3):559-575.
What If the Principle of Induction is Normative? Means-Ends Epistemology and Hume's Problem.Daniel Steel - manuscript
Some Observations on Induction in Predicate Probabilistic Reasoning.M. J. Hill, J. B. Paris & G. M. Wilmers - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (1):43-75.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2014-02-06
Total views
50 ( #226,843 of 2,507,718 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #169,849 of 2,507,718 )
2014-02-06
Total views
50 ( #226,843 of 2,507,718 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #169,849 of 2,507,718 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads