Abstract
The central problem of political philosophy is how to justify coercion by government. For political theories that are based in a rational accounting of the interests of the polity, citizens must have consented at least indirectly to coercion. Such indirect consent to coercion is plausible for ordinary contexts such as, for example, submitting to legally enforceable contracts. Unfortunately, however, Hobbesian mutual advantage, contemporary contractarian, and Lockean natural rights theories, all of which ground the state in rational interests at least in large part, can justify government coercion only in principle. They cannot justify coercion by actual states. In practice, these theories are morally indeterminate
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1053-8364
DOI 10.5840/jpr_1990_8
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,634
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

On the Concept of Political Manipulation.Gregory Whitfield - 2020 - Sage Publications: European Journal of Political Theory 21 (4):783-807.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Coercion and Justice.Laura Valentini - 2011 - American Political Science Review 105 (1):205-220.
Penal Coercion in Contexts of Social Injustice.Roberto Gargarella - 2011 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (1):21-38.
State Coercion and Force.Christopher W. Morris - 2012 - Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (1):28-49.
Threats and Coercion.Martin Gunderson - 1979 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9 (2):247 - 259.
Family Coercion and Valid Consent.Stephen D. Mallary, Bernard Gert & Charles M. Culver - 1986 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (2).
Consent Under Pressure: The Puzzle of Third Party Coercion.Joseph Millum - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (1):113-127.
Law and Coercion.Robert C. Hughes - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (3):231-240.
Bargaining Advantages and Coercion in the Market.Joan Mcgregor - 1988 - Philosophy Research Archives 14:23-50.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-12-02

Total views
126 ( #95,241 of 2,533,755 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #260,225 of 2,533,755 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes