Relative compatibility in conventional quantum mechanics
Foundations of Physics 7 (7-8):495-510 (1977)
Abstract
The notion of relative compability is introduced, according to which compatibility is construed as relative to individual quantum states. The compatibility domain of two observablesA, B is defined to be the set com(A, B) of states relative to whichA andB are compatible. Three basic categories of relative compatibility are then defined according to the character of com(A, B): absolute compatibility (ordinary compatibility), absolute incompatibility, and partial compatibility. Then com(A, B) is seen to be a subspace of Hilbert space invariant underA andB; being a subspace, it corresponds to a quantum binary observable (projection), denotedc(A, B). IfA andB are themselves binary observables, thenc(A, B) is expressible as a quantum logical compound ofA andB using the lattice operations meet, join, and orthocomplement. This suggests extending the notion of relative compatibility to the theory of orthomodular lattices, as well as to more general lattice-theoretic formulations of quantum mechanicsDOI
10.1007/bf00708865
My notes
Similar books and articles
Relative compatibility and joint distributions of observables.Sylvia Pulmannová - 1980 - Foundations of Physics 10 (7-8):641-653.
Strongly Incompatible Quantum Devices.Teiko Heinosaari, Takayuki Miyadera & Daniel Reitzner - 2014 - Foundations of Physics 44 (1):34-57.
S-R compatibility and the relative frequency effect in choice reaction time.Harold L. Hawkins & James R. Underhill - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 91 (2):280.
A double deduction system for quantum logic based on natural deduction.Yannis Delmas-Rigoutsos - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (1):57-67.
Are Automatic Imitation and Spatial Compatibility Mediated by Different Processes?Richard P. Cooper, Caroline Catmur & Cecilia Heyes - 2013 - Cognitive Science 37 (4):605-630.
Quantum mechanics versus special relativity: A forgotten conflict.Rafael-Andrés Alemañ-Berenguer - unknown
Everett's relative-state formulation of quantum mechanics.Jeffrey Barrett - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Physical Relations or Functional Relations? A non-metaphysical construal of Rovelli’s Relational Quantum Mechanics.Michel Bitbol - unknown
Proposed Test of Relative Phase as Hidden Variable in Quantum Mechanics.Steven Peil - 2012 - Foundations of Physics 42 (12):1523-1533.
Elucidation of the probabilistic structure of quantum mechanics and definition of a compatible joint probability.Mioara Mugur-Schächter - 1982 - Foundations of Physics 12 (11):1085-1085.
Reconstruction theorems in quantum mechanics.P. C. Zabey - 1975 - Foundations of Physics 5 (2):323-342.
A real ensemble interpretation of quantum mechanics.Lee Smolin - 2012 - Foundations of Physics 42 (10):1239-1261.
Quantum Theory Without Hilbert Spaces.C. Anastopoulos - 2001 - Foundations of Physics 31 (11):1545-1580.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-22
Downloads
38 (#309,488)
6 months
1 (#451,398)
2013-11-22
Downloads
38 (#309,488)
6 months
1 (#451,398)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
A search for the physical content of luders' rule.Sergio Martinez - 1990 - Synthese 82 (1):97 - 125.