Moral Philosophy, Political Philosophy, and Organizational Ethics: A Response to Phillips and Margolis

Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (4):673-685 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abstract:Phillips and Margolis argue that moral philosophy is a poor basis for business ethics, but their narrow view of moral philosophy would exclude Aristotle, for one. They criticize me for assimilating states and organizations in using the Rawlsian device, but they put too much faith in Rawls’s distinction between states and voluntary organizations and pay too little attention to the continuities between them. Their plea for a conceptually autonomous ethics for organizations I interpret as reasonable and largely compatible with my own stated opinion.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-18

Downloads
60 (#257,746)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Word and Object.Henry W. Johnstone - 1961 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 22 (1):115-116.
Perpetual Peace.IMMANUEL KANT - 1940 - Philosophical Review 49:380.
The priority of right and ideas of the good.John Rawls - 1988 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 17 (4):251-276.

View all 13 references / Add more references