Locke's Triangles

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 18 (1):31 - 41 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One of the most frequently discussed passages from Locke's An Essay Concerning the Human Understanding is that which occurs in IV.vii.9, where he writes:… the Ideas first in the Mind, ‘tis evident, are those of particular Things, from whence, by slow degrees, the Understanding proceeds to some few general ones; which being taken from the ordinary and familiar Objects of Sense, are settled in the Mind, with general Names to them. Thus particular Ideas are first received and distinguished, and so Knowledge got about them: and next to them, the less general, or specifick, which are next to particular. For abstract Ideas are not so obvious or easie to Children, or the yet unexercised Mind, as particular ones. If they seem so to grown Men, ’tis only because by constant and familiar use they are made so. For when we nicely reflect upon them, we shall find, that general Ideas are Fictions and Contrivances of the Mind, that carry difficulty with them, and do not so easily offer themselves, as we are apt to imagine. For example, Does it not require some pains and skill to form the general Idea of a Triangle, for it must be neither Oblique, nor Rectangle, neither Equilateral, Equicrural, nor Scalenon; but all and none of these at once. In effect, it is something imperfect, that cannot exist; an Idea wherein some parts of several different and inconsistent Ideas are put together.I shall not pretend that what Locke is claiming in this passage is wholly clear, nor shall I try to defend the views expressed in it. My intention is to show that what he says here has been widely misinterpreted. It has become common to treat the contents of the passage as aberrant; as presenting a ridiculous variant on his main thesis on abstraction, or that very thesis elaborated with a foolish rhetorical flourish. But what is said in this passage is not something said elsewhere, nor is it an alternative to something said elsewhere. Here, and nowhere else, Locke shows awareness of implications for his doctrine of abstraction, of views he holds about simple ideas.

Other Versions

original E. Harris, N. G. (1988) "Locke's Triangles". Canadian Journal of Philosophy 18(1):31-41

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,666

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Locke's Triangles.N. G. E. Harris - 1988 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 18 (1):31-41.
Descartes’s Secular Semantics.Alan Hausman & David Hausman - 1992 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 22 (1):81 - 104.
Abstract General Ideas in Hume.George S. Pappas - 1989 - Hume Studies 15 (2):339-352.
Are Locke’s Abstract Ideas Fictions?Sally Ferguson - 1999 - Review of Metaphysics 53 (1):129 - 140.
Simple and Complex Ideas.Terry Riordan - 1985 - Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis 6 (2).
Reid’s Answer to Abstract Ideas.Susan V. Castagnetto - 1992 - Journal of Philosophical Research 17:39-60.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
67 (#291,171)

6 months
12 (#232,423)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

An Essay Concerning Human Understanding.H. R. Smart - 1925 - Philosophical Review 34 (4):413.
Berkeley's theory of abstract ideas.C. C. W. Taylor - 1978 - Philosophical Quarterly 28 (111):97-115.
Berkeley.Antony Flew - 1955 - Philosophical Quarterly 5 (18):84-84.

Add more references