- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
James is polite and punctual (and useless): A Bayesian formalisation of faint praise
Thinking and Reasoning 19 (3-4):414-429 (2013)
Abstract
No abstractAuthor's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Because Hitler did it! Quantitative tests of Bayesian argumentation using ad hominem.Adam J. L. Harris, Anne S. Hsu & Jens K. Madsen - 2012 - Thinking and Reasoning 18 (3):311 - 343.
Bayesian argumentation and the pragmatic approach: Comment on Darmstadter.Mike Oaksford - 2013 - Thinking and Reasoning 19 (3-4):495-499.
Rationality in the new paradigm: Strict versus soft Bayesian approaches.Shira Elqayam & Jonathan St B. T. Evans - 2013 - Thinking and Reasoning 19 (3-4):453-470.
Evolutionary modules and Bayesian facilitation: The role of general cognitive resources.Elise Lesage, Gorka Navarrete & Wim De Neys - 2013 - Thinking and Reasoning 19 (1):27 - 53.
Punctual Selves, Punctual Death, and the Health-Conscious Cogito: Descartes' Dead Bodies.Thomas F. Tierney - 2012 - Economy and Society 41 (2):258-81.
The parallel of the arts: Some misgivings and a faint affirmation.James D. Merriman - 1973 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 31 (3):309-321.
The parallel of the arts: Some misgivings and a faint affirmation: Part.James D. Merriman - 1972 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 31 (2):153-164.
Tiger Mothers and Praise Junkies: Children, Praise and the Reactive Attitudes.Judith Suissa - 2013 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 47 (1):1-19.
The role of Bayesian philosophy within Bayesian model selection.Jan Sprenger - 2013 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 3 (1):101-114.
Are there still things to do in bayesian statistics?Persi Diaconis & Susan Holmes - 1996 - Erkenntnis 45 (2-3):145 - 158.
Hierarchical Bayesian models as formal models of causal reasoning.York Hagmayer & Ralf Mayrhofer - 2013 - Argument and Computation 4 (1):36 - 45.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-10-18
Downloads
40 (#389,966)
6 months
17 (#142,329)
2013-10-18
Downloads
40 (#389,966)
6 months
17 (#142,329)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Formal models of source reliability.Christoph Merdes, Momme von Sydow & Ulrike Hahn - 2020 - Synthese 198 (S23):5773-5801.
The Appeal to Expert Opinion: Quantitative Support for a Bayesian Network Approach.Adam J. L. Harris, Ulrike Hahn, Jens K. Madsen & Anne S. Hsu - 2016 - Cognitive Science 40 (6):1496-1533.
A normative framework for argument quality: argumentation schemes with a Bayesian foundation.Ulrike Hahn & Jos Hornikx - 2016 - Synthese 193 (6):1833-1873.
The Bi-directional Relationship between Source Characteristics and Message Content.Peter J. Collins, Ulrike Hahn, Ylva von Gerber & Erik J. Olsson - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
When Absence of Evidence Is Evidence of Absence: Rational Inferences From Absent Data.Anne S. Hsu, Andy Horng, Thomas L. Griffiths & Nick Chater - 2017 - Cognitive Science 41 (S5):1155-1167.
References found in this work
The rationality of informal argumentation: A Bayesian approach to reasoning fallacies.Ulrike Hahn & Mike Oaksford - 2007 - Psychological Review 114 (3):704-732.
Conservatism in a simple probability inference task.Lawrence D. Phillips & Ward Edwards - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (3):346.
Argument Content and Argument Source: An Exploration.Ulrike Hahn, Adam J. L. Harris & Adam Corner - 2009 - Informal Logic 29 (4):337-367.
Because Hitler did it! Quantitative tests of Bayesian argumentation using ad hominem.Adam J. L. Harris, Anne S. Hsu & Jens K. Madsen - 2012 - Thinking and Reasoning 18 (3):311 - 343.
Nonfallacious Arguments from Ignorance.Douglas Walton - 1992 - American Philosophical Quarterly 29 (4):381 - 387.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-5tf24 uwo