Influence of response shift and disposition on patient-reported outcomes may lead to suboptimal medical decisions: a medical ethics perspective
Iris D. Hartog, Dick L. Willems, Wilbert B. van den Hout, Michael Scherer-Rath, Tom H. Oreel, José P. S. Henriques, Pythia T. Nieuwkerk, Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven & Mirjam A. G. Sprangers
BMC Medical Ethics 20 (1):1-7 (2019)
AbstractPatient-reported outcomes are frequently used for medical decision making, at the levels of both individual patient care and healthcare policy. Evidence increasingly shows that PROs may be influenced by patients’ response shifts and dispositions. We identify how response shifts and dispositions may influence medical decisions on both the levels of individual patient care and health policy. We provide examples of these influences and analyse the consequences from the perspectives of ethical principles and theories of just distribution. If influences of response shift and disposition on PROs and consequently medical decision making are not considered, patients may not receive optimal treatment and health insurance packages may include treatments that are not the most effective or cost-effective. We call on healthcare practitioners, researchers, policy makers, health insurers, and other stakeholders to critically reflect on why and how such patient reports are used.
Similar books and articles
Decision Making in Health Care: Theory, Psychology, and Applications.Gretchen B. Chapman & Frank A. Sonnenberg (eds.) - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.
Ethics in Health Care and Medical Technologies.Carol Taylor - 1990 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 11 (2).
Empowerment Failure: How Shortcomings in Physician Communication Unwittingly Undermine Patient Autonomy.Peter A. Ubel, Karen A. Scherr & Angela Fagerlin - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (11):31-39.
Value-Impregnated Factual Claims May Undermine Medical Decision-Making.Niels Lynøe, Gert Helgesson & Niklas Juth - 2018 - Clinical Ethics 13 (3):151-158.
Extending the Boundaries of Care: Medical Ethics and Caring Practices.Tamara Kohn & Rosemary McKechnie (eds.) - 1999 - Berg.
Adversaries at the Bedside: Advance Care Plans and Future Welfare.Aidan Kestigian & Alex John London - 2016 - Bioethics 30 (8):557-567.
Cost-Equivalence and Pluralism in Publicly-Funded Health-Care Systems.Dominic Wilkinson & Julian Savulescu - 2018 - Health Care Analysis 26 (4):287-309.
Failure of the Current Advance Care Planning Paradigm: Advocating for a Communications-Based Approach.Laura Vearrier - 2016 - HEC Forum 28 (4):339-354.
“It Was the Best Decision of My Life”: A Thematic Content Analysis of Former Medical Tourists’ Patient Testimonials.Carly Hohm & Jeremy Snyder - 2015 - BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):8.
Value Judgements in the Decision-Making Process for the Elderly Patient.J. Ubachs-Moust, R. Houtepen, R. Vos & R. ter Meulen - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (12):863-868.
Decisions Relating to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Commentary 1: CPR and the Cost of Autonomy.Robin Gill - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (5):317-318.
Wrong Medicine: Doctors, Patients, and Futile Treatment.L. J. Schneiderman - 1995 - Johns Hopkins University Press.
Should Artificial Intelligence Augment Medical Decision Making? The Case for an Autonomy Algorithm.Camillo Lamanna - 2018 - AMA Journal of Ethics 9 (20):E902-910.
Principles and Purpose: The Patient Surrogate's Perspective and Role.Tom Koch - 1997 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 6 (4):461.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
A Second Rebuttal On Health.Christopher Boorse - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (6):683-724.