Gregory Nazianzen’s Festal Spirituality

Philosophy and Theology 18 (1):27-51 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper analyzes the feast days of the Orthodox Church from the point of view of St. Gregory of Nazianzus. Liturgical scholars raise questions about the relationships between past and future, anamnesis and mimesis, the sanctification of time and longing for the eschaton. Investigation of Gregory’s liturgical theology, which has had unparalleled influence in the Byzantine rite churches, shows that all of these are false dichotomies. Gregory’s two homilies onPascha and his homilies on Christmas, Theophany, and Pentecost were preached throughout his public life. They show, in the feast days, anamnesis, in which the sacred events in Christ’s life are made present, and mimesis, the repetition of past events so as to arrive at the same future in God’s eternal kingdom. Patristics and liturgical scholars, however, have understood “mimesis” in different ways.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mimesis.Friedrich Balke, Bernhard Siegert & Joseph Vogl (eds.) - 2012 - München: Wilhelm Fink.
Reason, Mimesis, and Self-Preservation in Adorno.Owen Hulatt - 2016 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 54 (1):135-151.
Adorno’s Mimesis and its Limitations for Critical Social Thought.Ernesto Verdeja - 2009 - European Journal of Political Theory 8 (4):493-511.
The Pyrrhus Perplex: A Superficial View of Mimesis.Andrew J. McKenna - 1994 - Contagion: Journal of Violence, Mimesis, and Culture 1 (1):31-46.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
53 (#294,453)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references