Authors
Simon Rogerson
De Montfort University
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to set out a structured meta‐methodology, named DIODE, for the ethical assessment of new and emerging technologies. DIODE has been designed by a mixture of academics, governmental people and commercial practitioners. It is designed to help diverse organisations and individuals conduct ethical assessments of new and emerging technologies.Design/methodology/approachA framework discussion paper was developed for consultation to ensure that DIODE addresses fundamental ethical concerns, has appropriate and manageable scope and is comprehensive in its ethical compass. The resulting DIODE meta‐methodology uses flowcharts and templates, encompassing the use of diverse tools and techniques.FindingsThere are two different angles for the ethical assessment of new technologies; a strategic/abstract angle and a project/application specific angle. DIODE includes two channels to accommodate this distinction. Early stage testing yielded positive feedback and mostly favourable comment. Additional guidance materials are being developed in response to the feedback.Practical implicationsWithout training and guidance, it is difficult for technologists to take ethical concerns into account during the development and deployment of new technologies. DIODE can provide that training and guidance through a practical meta‐methodology which should help ICT professionals, policy makers and academics.Originality/valueThere is very little structured methodology material available on the ethical assessment of new technologies. The depth and sophistication contained in DIODE is therefore believed to be unique. DIODE provides practical help while remaining rooted in the philosophical and theoretical concepts of ethics.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1108/14779961111123223
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,163
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What is Computer Ethics?James H. Moor - 1985 - Metaphilosophy 16 (4):266-275.
Why We Need Better Ethics for Emerging Technologies.James H. Moor - 2005 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (3):111-119.
Ethics and Technology Design.Anders Albrechtslund - 2007 - Ethics and Information Technology 9 (1):63-72.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights.United Nations - 2009 - Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 21 (1-2):153-160.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Future Vision.Simon Rogerson - 2015 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 13 (3/4):346-360.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Anticipating Ethical Issues in Emerging IT.Philip A. E. Brey - 2012 - Ethics and Information Technology 14 (4):305-317.
A Meta-Theory for Ethical Theories.Bernard Rosen - 1975 - Journal of Value Inquiry 9 (1):12-23.
Credit Risk Assessment and Meta-Judgment.Suzanne Pinson - 1989 - Theory and Decision 27 (1-2):117-133.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-02-19

Total views
21 ( #534,601 of 2,506,525 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,791 of 2,506,525 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes