University of California Press (1997)
Abstract |
In this significant new addition to moral theory, George Harris challenges a view of the dignity and worth of persons that goes back through Kant and Christianity to the Stoics. He argues that we do not, in fact, believe this view, which traces any breakdowns of character to failures of strength. When it comes to what we actually value in ourselves and others, he says, we are far more Greek than Christian. At the most profound level, we value ourselves as natural organisms, as animals, rather than as godlike beings who transcend nature. The Kantian-Christian-Stoic tradition holds that if we were fully able to realize our dignity as Kantians, Christians, or Stoics, we would be better, stronger people, and therefore less vulnerable to character breakdown. _Dignity and Vulnerability_ offers an opposing view, that sometimes character breaks down not because of some shortcoming in it but because of what is good about it, because of the very virtues and features of character that give us our dignity. If dignity can make us fragile and vulnerable to breakdown, then breakdown can be benign as well as harmful, and thus the conceptions of human dignity embedded in the tradition leading up to Kant are deeply mistaken. Harris proposes a foundation for our belief in human dignity in what we can actually know about ourselves, rather than in metaphysical or theological fantasy. Having gained this knowledge, we can understand the source of real strength.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 2020, 2021 |
Buy this book | $85.00 new $168.20 used Amazon page |
ISBN(s) | 0520304659 0520356365 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
A Humanistic Perspective for Management Theory: Protecting Dignity and Promoting Well-Being.Michael Pirson - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 159 (1):39-57.
The Basis and Relevance of Emotional Dignity.David Badcott - 2003 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (2):123-131.
Similar books and articles
Dignity and Vulnerability: Strength and Quality of Character.Elinor Mason - 2002 - Mind 111 (443):680-683.
Dignity and Vulnerability: Strength and Quality of Character. [REVIEW]Anthony Cunningham - 1997 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):239-241.
Dignity and Vulnerability: Strength and Quality of Character.David Cummiskey - 2000 - Philosophical Review 109 (1):128.
George W. Harris, Dignity and Vulnerability: Strength and Quality of Character.George Schedler - 1998 - Southwest Philosophy Review 14 (2):203-205.
Book Reviews:Dignity and Vulnerability: Strength and Quality of Character. [REVIEW]Laurence Thomas - 2000 - Ethics 111 (1):170-173.
Dignity and vulnerability. Strenght and quality of character.George W. Harris - 1997 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 189 (1):114-114.
A Normative Theory of Character and the Constituents of Character.Richard Lloyd Lippke - 1982 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Inherent Dignity, Contingent Dignity and Human Rights: Solving the Puzzle of the Protection of Dignity.Jan-Willem van der Rijt - 2017 - Erkenntnis 82 (6):1321-1338.
The Relevance of Karl Rahner’s View of Human Dignity for the Catholic Social Thought Tradition.Matthew Petrusek - 2015 - Philosophy and Theology 27 (2):513-538.
Kant’s Idea of Human Dignity: Between Tradition and Originality.Stefano Bacin - 2015 - Kant Studien 106 (1):97-106.
Dignity and Respect for Dignity - Two Key Health Professional Values: Implications for Nursing Practice.Ann Gallagher - 2004 - Nursing Ethics 11 (6):587-599.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2017-09-04
Total views
1 ( #1,546,653 of 2,507,897 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,715 of 2,507,897 )
2017-09-04
Total views
1 ( #1,546,653 of 2,507,897 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,715 of 2,507,897 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.