Demarcation and The Created Controversy

Philosophia 45 (1):247-256 (2017)

Abstract

The problem of demarcation continues to attract attention, in part because solutions are perceived to have enormous social significance. The civic motivation, however, I argue is in tension with the heterogeneity of the sciences. Philosophers of science would be better employed reflecting on the features, causes, and consequences, of created, scientific controversies. These arise when relevant experts are in broad agreement about what conclusions can sensibly be drawn from available evidence, but the public perceives an expert community deeply divided and conclusions that are plagued by profound and systemic uncertainty. In the second part of the paper I explore this concept further.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,879

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-04

Downloads
21 (#540,355)

6 months
1 (#386,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Harker
East Tennessee State University

References found in this work

Social Empiricism.Miriam Solomon - 2001 - Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Social Empiricism.Miriam Solomon - 1994 - Noûs 28 (3):325-343.
Social Epistemology.Steve Fuller - 1990 - Erkenntnis 33 (1):131-135.
Social Empiricism.Miriam Solomon - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (2):495-498.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

How Science Textbooks Treat Scientific Method: A Philosopher's Perspective.James Blachowicz - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (2):303--344.
Has Laudan Killed the Demarcation Problem?Kirsten Walsh - 2009 - Dissertation, University of Melbourne
The Demarcation Problem: A (Belated) Response to Laudan.Massimo Pigliucci - 2013 - In Massimo Pigliucci & Maarten Boudry (eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. University of Chicago Press. pp. 9.
A Pragmatic Approach to the Demarcation Problem.B. D. - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (2):249-267.
The Rhetorical Construction of Science: Demarcation as Rhetorical Practice.Charles Alan Taylor - 1990 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign