Dissertation, University of York (2022)

Abstract
Might fiction films have cognitive value, and if so, how might such value interact with films’ artistic and aesthetic values? Philosophical consideration of this question tends to consist in either ceteris paribus extensions of claims relating to prose fiction and literature; meta-philosophical inquiries into the capacity of films to be or do philosophy; or generalised investigations into the cognitive value of any, and thereby all, artworks. I first establish that fiction films can be works of art, then address this lacuna and identify three hitherto unrecognised values relevant to the issue of learning from fiction films. These values are (i) a film’s stance-based cinematic value, which is neither an artistic nor an aesthetic value, but which pertains to the integration of a film’s content, its form, and its themes and/or theses; (ii) a film’s dramatic value, which recognises the use of dramatic argumentation to enable us to make sense of agents’ intentional actions; and (iii) a film’s humanistic value which acknowledges a film’s power to provide illuminating insights into the human condition. In tandem with a series of sceptical arguments that question the very notion of cognitive value, I demonstrate how stance-based cinematic value, dramatic value, and humanistic value can provide fresh ways with which to understand and appreciate that we learn from films, what we learn from films, and how we learn from films. Grouping these values together under the rubric of cinematic humanism offers new resources for a paradigm shift capable of staying true to the spirit that informs both sides of the cognitivist/non-cognitivist debate whilst cutting through the Gordian knot it has become.
Keywords film   cognitivism   philosophy without theory   humanism   value
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

True Enough.Catherine Z. Elgin - 2017 - Cambridge: MIT Press.
What is Philosophy?Gilles Deleuze & Félix Guattari - 1991 - Columbia University Press.
Knowing How.Jason Stanley & Timothy Willlamson - 2001 - Journal of Philosophy 98 (8):411-444.
Is Understanding a Species of Knowledge?Stephen R. Grimm - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (3):515-535.
The Artworld.Arthur Danto - 1964 - Journal of Philosophy 61 (19):571-584.

View all 53 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

"The New World": Heideggerian or Humanist Cinema?Britt Harrison - 2020 - Aesthetic Investigations 3 (2):200-227.
Philosophical Dimensions of Cinematic Experience.David Davies - 2019 - In Christina Rawls, Diana Neiva & Steven Gouveia (eds.), Philosophy and Film: Bridging Divides. New York: Routledge. pp. 135-156.
Cinematic Humanism or Grand Theory?Thomas E. Wartenberg - 2002 - Film and Philosophy 5:131-137.
Recent Work on Cinema as Philosophy.Paisley Nathan Livingston - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (4):590-603.
Humanism: An Introduction.Jim Herrick - 2003 - Prometheus Books.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2022-06-19

Total views
101 ( #117,274 of 2,519,496 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
101 ( #7,057 of 2,519,496 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes