Dissertation, University of York (2022)
Abstract |
Might fiction films have cognitive value, and if so, how might such value interact with films’ artistic and aesthetic values? Philosophical consideration of this question tends to consist in either ceteris paribus extensions of claims relating to prose fiction and literature; meta-philosophical inquiries into the capacity of films to be or do philosophy; or generalised investigations into the cognitive value of any, and thereby all, artworks. I first establish that fiction films can be works of art, then address this lacuna and identify three hitherto unrecognised values relevant to the issue of learning from fiction films. These values are (i) a film’s stance-based cinematic value, which is neither an artistic nor an aesthetic value, but which pertains to the integration of a film’s content, its form, and its themes and/or theses; (ii) a film’s dramatic value, which recognises the use of dramatic argumentation to enable us to make sense of agents’ intentional actions; and (iii) a film’s humanistic value which acknowledges a film’s power to provide illuminating insights into the human condition. In tandem with a series of sceptical arguments that question the very notion of cognitive value, I demonstrate how stance-based cinematic value, dramatic value, and humanistic value can provide fresh ways with which to understand and appreciate that we learn from films, what we learn from films, and how we learn from films. Grouping these values together under the rubric of cinematic humanism offers new resources for a paradigm shift capable of staying true to the spirit that informs both sides of the cognitivist/non-cognitivist debate whilst cutting through the Gordian knot it has become.
|
Keywords | film cognitivism philosophy without theory humanism value |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Is Understanding a Species of Knowledge?Stephen R. Grimm - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (3):515-535.
View all 53 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Introducing Cinematic Humanism: A Solution to the Problem of Cinematic Cognitivism.Britt Harrison - 2019 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 19 (2):331-349.
"The New World": Heideggerian or Humanist Cinema?Britt Harrison - 2020 - Aesthetic Investigations 3 (2):200-227.
The View From Outside: On a Distinctively Cinematic Achievement.Mario De Caro & Enrico Terrone - 2016 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 42 (2):154-170.
Fictional Indeterminacy, Imagined Seeing, and Cinematic Narration.Angela Curran - 2016 - In Katherine Thomson-Jones (ed.), Current Controversies in the Philosophy of Film. Routledge. pp. 99-114.
Does the Debate About Cinematic Motion Rest on a Mistake?Rafael De Clercq - 2017 - Analysis 77 (3):519-525.
Philosophical Dimensions of Cinematic Experience.David Davies - 2019 - In Christina Rawls, Diana Neiva & Steven Gouveia (eds.), Philosophy and Film: Bridging Divides. New York: Routledge. pp. 135-156.
A Cinema for the Ears: Imagining the Audio-Cinematic Through Podcasting.Dario Llinares - 2020 - Film-Philosophy 24 (3):341-365.
Recent Work on Cinema as Philosophy.Paisley Nathan Livingston - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (4):590-603.
The Cinematic Political: Film Composition as Political Theory.Michael J. Shapiro - 2019 - Routledge.
Mechanical Reproduction and Cinematic Humanism.Joseph Margolis - 2002 - Film and Philosophy 5:114-130.
Margolis, Mechanical Reproduction and Cinematic Humanism.Noël Carroll - 2002 - Film and Philosophy 5:138-142.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2022-06-19
Total views
101 ( #117,274 of 2,519,496 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
101 ( #7,057 of 2,519,496 )
2022-06-19
Total views
101 ( #117,274 of 2,519,496 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
101 ( #7,057 of 2,519,496 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads