Biobanking Research and Privacy Laws in the United States

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 44 (1):106-127 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Privacy is protected in biobank-based research in the US primarily by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Privacy Rule and the Federal Policy for Protection of Human Subjects. Neither rule, however, was created to function in the unique context of biobank research, and therefore neither applies to all biobank-based research. Not only is it challenging to determine when the HIPAA Privacy Rule or the Common Rule apply, but these laws apply different standards to protect privacy. In addition, many other federal and state laws may be applicable to a particular biobank, researcher, or project. US law also does not directly address international sharing of data or specimens outside of the EU–US Safe Harbor Agreement, which only applies to receipt of data by certain US entities from EU countries, and is in the process of revision. Although new rules would help clarify privacy protections in biobanking, any implemented changes should be studied to determine the sufficiency of the protections as well as its ability to facilitate or hinder international collaborations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Biobanking and Privacy Laws in Australia.Don Chalmers - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (4):703-713.
Biobank research and the right to privacy.Lars Øystein Ursin - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (4):267-285.
Privacy Laws and Biobanking in Germany.Nils Hoppe - 2016 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 44 (1):35-44.
Regulation of Biobanks in France.Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag & Anna Pigeon - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (4):754-765.
EU Laws on Privacy in Genomic Databases and Biobanking.David Townend - 2016 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 44 (1):128-142.
Privacy and Biobanking in China: A Case of Policy in Transition.Haidan Chen, Benny Chan & Yann Joly - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (4):726-742.
The problem of ignoring interconnectedness in genetic research.J. F. Meschia - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (6):477-477.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-14

Downloads
14 (#934,671)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Have We Asked Too Much of Consent?Barbara A. Koenig - 2014 - Hastings Center Report 44 (4):33-34.
Currents in Contemporary Ethics.Mark A. Rothstein - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (1):154-159.
Regulation of Next Generation Sequencing.Gail H. Javitt & Katherine Strong Carner - 2014 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 42 (s1):9-21.

View all 10 references / Add more references